![]() Notably, this behavior is identical to what Hunter S. Unlike the "summary" prompts (in which GPT-Thompson only occasionally chose to accompany his commentary with unprintable calumny and scathing political rants), the "acerbic quip" prompts solely produced output ranging from obscene and irreverent to maliciously slanderous. Īfterwards, I provided the summary itself as a prompt, and asked GPT-Thompson for an "acerbic quip" on each. Thompson for Rolling Stone's monthly feature on Wikipedia deletion processes."ĭespite being ostensibly written in Thompson's style, these were generally quite straightforward summaries that covered the arguments made during each discussion, with hardly any profanity. "The following text is a summary of the above discussion, written by Gonzo journalist Hunter S. įor each discussion in the report, I provided a full transcript of the AfD page (with timestamps and long signatures truncated to aid processing), and prompted GPT-3 for a completion, using some variation on the following: " Ukrainian Insurgent Army war against Russian occupation", for example, was a whopping 126,000 bytes (and needed to be processed in several segments) but the description was accurate. GPT-Thompson proved quite capable of accurately summarizing the slings and arrows of every discussion in the report – even though it specifically covers the longest and most convoluted AfDs. ![]() This produced a mixture of insightful, incisive, and derisive commentary. In this issue, two articles have been written by an AI model called GPT-3: the deletion report and the arbitration report.įor the deletion report, GPT-3 was prompted with a transcript of each discussion in the report, and instructed to write a summary of it in the style of deceased Gonzo journalist Hunter S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |